Results Details

Why should one not seize one if it is convenient to do so? Others may not have wanted the slaves to fall into the hands of the hated Cosians, simply to deprive them of this loot, or perhaps, more, to deny to them the inordinate rewards and pleasures which accrue to a male from the ownership of a female slave. - (Renegades of Gor, Chapter 18, Sentence #312)

I wondered about this, but supposed the motivations might have been multifarious. Some of the free women may have taken custody of a female slave in order to use her to distract Cosians, or to barter with them, perhaps thinking to prevail upon them to accept the slave as a substitute for themselves, thereby securing their own freedom. On the other hand, the slave does have value and if one is in desperate need of coins, she may be sold. Why should one not seize one if it is convenient to do so? Others may not have wanted the slaves to fall into the hands of the hated Cosians, simply to deprive them of this loot, or perhaps, more, to deny to them the inordinate rewards and pleasures which accrue to a male from the ownership of a female slave. Or perhaps it was simply a matter of taking possessions along with one, as one might, similarly, attempt to preserve one's livestock, as one might, in flight, say, herd verr or tarsks before one. Or perhaps even it was a symptom of the free woman's envy and hatred of the female slave, so profoundly and widely evidenced, that she wanted to keep the slave from experiencing the joys of being categorically possessed by men, that she wanted to deny to the slave, so lowly and despised, so hated, the bliss and ecstasies accruing to the embonded, mastered female. Why should a collar slut, an animalized property, and not she, revel in the joys of submission and service, helpless in the thrills of being utterly dominated, denied to the free woman? Surely she should be denied the unspeakable gratifications consequent upon her contemptible status. - (Renegades of Gor, Chapter 18)