• Home
  • Contact

Results Details

"continue "

Book 17. (1 results) Savages of Gor (Individual Quote)

Perhaps when the belief simply becomes too archaic, obsolete and unwieldy to defend, when it becomes simply preposterous and blatantly irrational to seriously continue to defend it, then, perhaps, if one still continues, compulsively, to defend it, one might speak of insanity". - (Savages of Gor, Chapter 17, Sentence #594)
Chapter # Sentence # Quote
17 594 View more quotes about perhaps">Perhaps when the belief simply becomes too archaic, obsolete and unwieldy to defend, when it becomes simply preposterous and blatantly irrational to seriously continue to defend it, then, perhaps, if one still continues, compulsively, to defend it, one might speak of insanity".

Book 17. (7 results) Savages of Gor (Context Quote)

Chapter # Sentence # Quote
17 591 "Theoretically a society could believe numerous false propositions and still, in normal senses of the word, be regarded as a sane, if, in many respects, a mistaken society".
17 592 "What if a society is mistaken, and takes pains to avoid rectifying its errors, what if it refuses, in the light of evidence, to correct its mistakes?" "Evidence can usually be explained away or reinterpreted to accord with treasured beliefs," I said.
17 593 "I think it is usually a matter of degree.
17 594 Perhaps when the belief simply becomes too archaic, obsolete and unwieldy to defend, when it becomes simply preposterous and blatantly irrational to seriously continue to defend it, then, perhaps, if one still continues, compulsively, to defend it, one might speak of insanity".
17 595 "I should think so," she said.
17 596 "But even then," I said, "other concepts might be more fruitful, such as radical obstinacy or institutionalized irrationality".
17 597 "Why?" she asked.
"Theoretically a society could believe numerous false propositions and still, in normal senses of the word, be regarded as a sane, if, in many respects, a mistaken society". "What if a society is mistaken, and takes pains to avoid rectifying its errors, what if it refuses, in the light of evidence, to correct its mistakes?" "Evidence can usually be explained away or reinterpreted to accord with treasured beliefs," I said. "I think it is usually a matter of degree. Perhaps when the belief simply becomes too archaic, obsolete and unwieldy to defend, when it becomes simply preposterous and blatantly irrational to seriously continue to defend it, then, perhaps, if one still continues, compulsively, to defend it, one might speak of insanity". "I should think so," she said. "But even then," I said, "other concepts might be more fruitful, such as radical obstinacy or institutionalized irrationality". "Why?" she asked. - (Savages of Gor)